Romans Ch. 13 Obey and submit yourselves to those in government
Titus 3:1-3 Obey and submit yourselves to those in government
Hebrews 13:17 Obey and submit yourselves to those who teach you God's word [church rulers]
Romans 15:18 I shall make the Gentiles obedient in word and deed
Acts 4:34-35 The Gentiles sold their houses and land and brought the sales proceeds to the [false apostles] and laid the money at their feet
Romans 15:27 I taught the Gentiles it is their duty to give us money
The Benjamite wolf Pharisees, (and the false apostle and anti-Christ Pharisee Paul is a Pharisee from the tribe of Benjamin), could not defeat the followers of Christ in totalitiy, but did their best to imprison and kill every follower of Christ they could get their hands on:
Acts 9:1-2 [Pharisee Paul] went to the high priest to get letters to Damascus to the SYNAGOGUES that if he found any of the Way [any Jewish believers on Christ] both men and women that he could bring them bound to Jerusalem
Note, Christians, your master Pharisee Paul persecuted Jewish believers on Christ in their synagogues. The pathetically stupid Christians say Paul was appointed by Christ to preach a new gospel to the Gentiles - that being their belief, then who founded churches if not Pharisee Paul? Since the Christians claim Christ appointed Paul to preach a new doctrine for the Gentiles, then what doctrine (if not Paul's doctrine), founded churches? If Christ's doctrine founded churches (which it did not) then what need would there be for a new doctrine of the churches? But Christ specifically speaks against the church altar, against church rulers:
John 4:21 ... the time comes when you shall neither worship the Father in this mountain [Jacob's altar] nor at Jerusalem
John 4:23 But the hour comes and now is when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth ....
Where are the church altars in Christ's doctrine? Absolutely no where to be found, and that is how one knows that Christ did not establish church altars, and the silly evil Pharisees deceptively inserting the term church in Matthew and John's writings does not hold up when one sees that Christ specifically states the true worshipers have no altar to worship at when the Jerusalem Temple and Jacob's altar are no more. The Jerusalem Temple is yet to be and when it exists:
Revelation 11:1-2 Arise and measure the Temple and the altar and those that worship therein. But do not measure without the Temple, for it is given to the Gentiles who shall trample the holy city for forty two months
Here are the church altars:
Hebrews 13:10 We [Christians] have an altar that those who serve God's Temple have no right to eat at [the church altar founded by Pharisee Paul]
Christ says the Temple altar and those who worship therein are his, but the evil Pharisee Paul set up church altars for Gentiles and forbids those who worship at the Jerusalem Temple altar to kneel before church altars, not that any Jews who know their God would bend knee to the filthy unholy church altars, same goes for Gentiles.
Pharisee Paul was not a late comer to churches, allegedly persecuting churches before he was converted. If churches existed before Paul founded them, then on what doctrine were churches founded? If the Christians say churches were founded on the doctrine of Christ, then what need for a new doctrine from Christ if indeed churches were already founded on the doctrine of Christ (Matthew and John)? Why would the Christian church goers believe a Pharisee that he heard from Christ if they were already well-established in their churches on the doctrine of Christ? Furthermore, as established above, Christ did not give any altars to Gentiles, did not found church altars. It is Pharisee Paul who founded church altars for the purpose of stealing the wealth of Gentiles, as he taught his Gentile converts it is their duty to share their wealth with the church rulers.
But I challenge any Christian reading to show from Matthew and John's writings where Christ founded the church altars and church rulers. And do not point out the word 'church' in Matthew and John as proof of same, for the Pharisees of the 325 AD Catholic Council of Nicaea inserted the term 'church'. Rather, point out from Matthew and John's writings where Christ founded the church altar. Point out from said writings where Christ founded church rulers. And any honest person shall acknowledge, there is not anything in Matthew and John that establishes the church altar or the church rulers. But there is in Matthew and John doctrine of Christ that speaks specifically against church altars, and against church rulers (John 4:23, Matthew 23:8-10).
And whereas Pharisee Paul instructs his converts to obey and submit themselves to church rulers (those who teach God's word) and to all in government, Christ specifically speaks against such obedience and submission:
Matthew 23:8-10 Call no man master, call no man father [CATHOLICS] ....
10:18 You shall present my gospel before governors, kings and
Gentiles, as testimony against them [no submission and obedience to
those in government, but obedience to Christ alone]
The Book of Acts was written by a Pharisee. It contains some truth, specifically regarding the Jews of Asia (Acts 21:27-30), but mostly is lies, for example, claiming that which was the Anti-Christ Spirit was the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:3-4, 1 John 4:3, Romans 8:3). Christ had already breathed the Holy Spirit upon his apostles (John 20:22). The Book of Acts details Paul's alleged conversion to Christ, some of his deeds immediately before his alleged conversion and his movements and doings after alleged conversion. As to the specific details of what Paul was doing immediately before his alleged conversion, he was on his way to SYNAGOGUES in Damascus to arrest any Jews in the synagogues who were followers of Christ. Get that Christians, on his way to synagogues, not to churches, for no church existed until Pharisee Paul founded the church altars for Gentiles and placed Jew Pharisee converts as the rulers over the Gentiles in the first churches, which churches then became the Pharisees' empire, the Roman Catholic church, which is carried by the Beast of Revelation and which Beast shall be the eighth pope king of the Vatican (Bergoglio is the fifth pope king, Rev. 17:10-11, 17:5).
I have read some accounts of people pointing out very minor discrepancies in the recounting of Pharisee Paul's alleged conversion in the Book of Acts - but I have not seen any one point out the glaring and absolute contradictions regarding Pharisee Paul's alleged conversion as stated in the Book of Acts and as stated in Galatians:
Acts 9:8 And Saul arose from the earth and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man but they led him by the hand into Damascus
Acts 9:17 ... that you may receive your sight
Acts 9:18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales and he received sight immediately ....
The above is one version, below is a starkly different version of Pharisee Paul's alleged conversion:
Galatians 1:15-18 But when it pleased God who separated me from my mother's womb and called me by his grace to reveal his Son in me that I might preach him among the heathen, immediately I CONFERRED NOT WITH FLESH AND BLOOD, NEITHER WENT I TO JERUSALEM to them which were apostles before me, but I went into Arabia and returned again to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and abode with him fifteen days
Pharisee Paul specifically states that he was separate and apart from the apostles for three years after his alleged conversion, never meeting with them after his alleged conversion until three years thereafter - that is the version in Galatians, which is Paul's own writing to the Galatians. And in the Book of Acts is a tale of Pharisee Paul meeting with Peter, preaching and so on immediatley after his alleged conversion - a totally different version of his alleged conversion than that which is stated by Paul in his letter to the Galatians!
And so many Christians claim for themselves belief in and preach as though truth to others the story of Paul's conversion as stated in the Book of Acts, but if one takes as truth Paul's version of his alleged conversion in his letter to the Galatians, one must then throw out a substantial portion of the Book of Acts as to Paul's alleged doings after his alleged conversion! Go ahead stupid Christians and pick which version you want to believe, or be smart and recognize that Pharisee Paul is the anti-Christ, he is a liar:
1 John 2:18 You have heard that the anti-Christ shall come and now there are many anti-Christs
Romans 3:7 If the truth of God is being spread by my lie ...
What is Pharisee Paul's big lie:
Romans 6:14 We are not under the law, we are under grace
By the grace of God .... blah blah blah. And the disgusting man of Satan Paul says God chose him to reveal God's Son in him. The Son of God need not any man to reveal in him who the Son of God is, for the Son of God came to earth himself and revealed who the Son of God is:
John 3:19 ... light has come into the world ....
John 1:5 And the light shined in darkness and the darkness did not comprehend it
And the servants of Christ do not reveal the Son of God to people by revealing the Son in them, but rather reveal the Son by speaking the testimony of the Son (Matthew 10:18, 28:19, Rev. 14:6)! The Christians do not comprehend the light, they run to the darkness that is Pharisee Paul, that blind Pharisee who leads a hoard of blind Christians who claim they see but they do not comprehend the light, and Christ is the light.
And here again the evil Pharisees inserted yet another of their lies into John, claiming that Christ was not the light, but merely a witness of the Light (John 1:7), but we know the Pharisees inserted their lie in John 1:7 because Christ said he is in the Father and the Father is in him and that to see Christ is to see the Father, therefore Christ is the Light, the Son of God (John 14:9-11). Since the Father is the Light and to see Christ is to see the Father than Christ is the Light too. And Christ is God, the Son of God. The Holy Spirit is God and the Father is God - Genesis 1:26 Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness. And the three entity God is one Lord. Just as the Pharisees inserted the term 'son of man' in Matthew and John, claiming Christ was saying he is the son of man, but Christ specifically denied he was David's son (Matthew 22:41-46) and he was not being coy, denying David was his father, when some other man was his father, so too they inserted their lie that Christ is not the light!:
JOHN 8:12 ... I AM THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD ....
The prophets of God used the term 'son of man' as merely a descriptive term, that the Son of God shall appear to be a son of man, and he appears so because he came in the same flesh body as all men. But in the new testament, the Pharisees inserted the term 'son of man' as a state of being of Christ, that he is a son of man.
Follow Paul and end up in Hell with him and thereafter end up in the everlasting lake of fire with him:
Matthew 7:22-23 Many shall say to me in that day, but Lord Lord, we did many wonderful works in your name ... And I shall tell them, I never knew you. Depart from me, workers of lawlessness
To say that to believe on Paul's gospel makes one no more under the law, but under grace is to be a worker of lawlessness. No more law, grace. It does not matter that some children of Hell Paul converts want grace and the ten commandments, they still insist grace is truth and they claim Paul is of God, they claim church altars are of God, they claim church rulers are of God, they claim salvation is through Paul's gospel. Paul's defintion of grace is that while yet evildoers, God saves them by his grace. While yet evildoers, they are justified by the grace of God:
Romans 8:30 Whom he did predestinate [GRACE} them he also called, and whom he called them he also justified ....
Taking the story of Paul's alleged example of grace as an example of what he means in Romans 8:30, the murderer Paul is on his way to synagogues to bring back to Jerusalem as prisoners (who would then be put to death) those Jews who followed Christ, and then by the alleged grace of God he calls Paul to be his own, and the murderer is then immediately justified by God. But it does not work that way, people:
Matthew 11:20-24 Then Christ began to upbraid those town and cities wherein he did most of his mighty works because they WOULD NOT STOP DOING EVIL
But according to wolf anti-Christ Paul's grace doctrine, Christ need only bestow his grace upon the evildoers he chooses, calling them for his own and then such evildoers are justified by God. The truth is evildoers must first stop doing evil and then God is pleased with them!
EXODUS 23:7 ... I WILL NOT JUSTIFY THE WICKED
Wicked Pharisee Paul on his way to do wicked deeds to the Jewish believers in Christ was NOT justified by God, called by Paul's alleged grace of God lie and then justified by God! And Pharisee Paul in his alleged state of grace, justified by God states:
Romans 7:19 ... I AM A PRACTITIONER OF EVIL
And being that God NEVER justifies the wicked, that is why Christ specifically states what the condemnation of the wicked shall be - given the fact that the shed blood of Christ already paid the penalty for all sins (except blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, Matthew 12:32):
John 3:19 AND THIS IS THE CONDEMNATION ... they preferred their evil deeds
Salvation is through Christ's gospel, and Christ's message is the everlasting gospel, the everlasting doctrine which is: those who refuse to give up evil deeds will end up eternally damned:
Jonah 3:10 God saw their works that they turned from their evil deeds and he let them live
Had the Gentiles of Nineveh decided to continue doing evil, God would have destroyed them.
John 3:19 And this is the condemnation that light is come into the world but men loved darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil
14:6 And I, John, saw another angel flying through the midst of Heaven
having THE EVERLASTING gospel to preach to EVERY nation, tribe,
language and kindred
There again stated above, one gospel for all, not a doctrine of Christ for Jews and the doctrine of Pharisee Paul for Gentiles! Of course, there is a doctrine from Pharisee Paul for Gentiles, but it is not a doctrine of God, but of Satan. Pharisee Paul is the anti-Christ and his converts are the many anti-Christs (1 John 2:18).
How is it that the Gentiles of Nineveh were able to stop doing evil, but the founder of Christianity cannot stop doing evil?:
Romans 7:19 I do not know how to do good. I am a practitioner of evil
But the wolf Pharisee Paul does not believe he is a practitioner of evil, but rather beckons his children of Hell converts to assure themselves a place of eternal destruction:
Hebrews 10:26-27 If you sin willfully after knowing the truth, you are forever condemned
So much for wolf Paul's alleged 'grace, no more law', for there above he reveals his wolf fangs, sin after knowing the truth and you are forever condemned, so says the wolf Pharisee Paul. Did Pharisee Paul ever cease doing evil, was there a time when Pharisee Paul did not do evil deeds? He says he did not do evil in his deeds:
Philippians 3:4-6 ... As touching the law, a Pharisee ... as touching the righteousness that is the law, blameless
There is the master of Christians, Pharisee Paul, claiming that he kept all of God's law in his deeds without blame. Totally blameless before the Lord because as a Pharisee, he kept all the righteousnes that is the law. Then he says he voluntarily gave up following God's law in his deeds to follow Christ. Of course, Christ says Pharisees are all of Satan and do evil deeds, they do not follow God's law (John 8:44, Matthew 23:2-3). Follow the wolf Pharisee Paul, who with fellow Pharisee wolves made slaves of their Gentiles converts (Christians), and end up eternally damned (Matthew 7:22-23). This is the origin of Christianity:
Genesis 49:1, 49:27 ... in the last days ... Benjamin is as a wolf who devours his prey and divides the spoils
Philippians 3:5 I am a Pharisee from the tribe of Benjamin
Romans 15:27 I taught the Gentiles it is their duty to give us money
But the Christians these days have freedom to go or not go to a church, and freedom to give very little to churches or give a lot; but when the Pharisees' Roman Catholic church empire held supreme power, no such freedom unless one were of nobility or otherwise of high rank, such as knights. And some European governments impose a church tax, that if one refuses to pay they are forbidden from attending church. And under Protestant governments, laws enacted that impinge upon the God-given right of man to have as many wives as they want and/or concubines, to have long hair, to worship God freely without being forced into a church or forced to adhere to church doctrine made law by ruling governments, not so much these days but not too long in the past. For example, was not too long ago that a man and woman could not rent a hotel room unless they were married. Many such laws remain on the books of US states, though not at this time enforced. For rexample, it remains state law, but not enforced, in Florida that it is illegal for an unmarried couple to cohabitate. In Michigan it remains law on the state's book, but not enforced, that a man or woman can receive a life sentence in prison for adultery.
To Hell with Christianity, it is a dog religion of dogs, and only those who are good but deceived but which are too stupid to read Paul's writings and his fellow Pharisees' writings for themselves fall into the trap of being where they do not belong - churches:
Revelation 18:4 Come out of her my people ....
Of course, though, it is not the fault of those good people who love God that were deceived by churches for lack of opportunity to read Paul's gospel, the Pharisee writings 1 and 2 Peter, James and Jude, Mark and Luke, or to read the gospel of Christ (Matthew and John) - for the Pharisees of the Roman Catholic church, upon having come up with the book cover titled 'bible' and placing Torah writings, Tanakh writings and Matthew and John's writings and their own lying writings under one book cover 'bible', withdrew their bible from the public after some time (325 AD Catholic Council of Nicaea). The Roman Catholic church imposed the death penalty on any one possessing a bible without authorization from the church! And the Catholic church mass was spoken in a language that the church lay did not understand, even of recent time, until under the New World Order mass the Latin was dropped. Novus Ordo Missae, per Vatican Council II, in preparation of their New World Order plan to bring the planet under rule of the papacy. The New World Order is Vatican-Switzerland led and part of their plan is to bring into reality the meaning of the word Catholic - universal. Universal rule of the Roman Catholic church over every person on earth is the religious angle of the New World Order, and as to the type of NWO government - it is to be fascist. And I say 'government' because the NWO calls for one government over the entire world, the end of nation states having rule over themselves. Their grand NWO vision, but they shall fall in the process of trying to establish their vision (Daniel 11:14). And it won't be too long before they make their Fourth Reich world domination move, which entails a world war. The only time the Roman Catholic church realizes their universal vision is under the brief 42 month reign of the Beast on earth, when he arises from the bottomless pit to become the eighth pope king of the Vatican (Rev. 17:10-11, 11:7).
Come out of her my people, which refers to the Roman Catholic church (Rev. 18:4). There was no other church that existed when Christ from Heaven spoke to John and had John write the Book of Revelation. Not until the 4th century did another church arise, the Ethiopian church. But Christ does say, the Roman Catholic church is the mother of all harlots of the earth (Rev. 17:5); and those harlots are all non-Catholic Christian churches - the same gospel of anti-Christ Pharisee Paul that founded the first churches which became an empire for the Pharisees, (the Roman Catholic church), founded all other Christian churches.
The non-slave doctrine of Christ, a slave to Christ alone which is okay because no one loves a good person more than Christ, and Christ the Son of God, is by whom all things were created:
John 1:2-3 The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him, and without him was not anything made that was made
So how silly of the evil Pharisees to insert their lie in John 1:7 to say Christ is not the Light but merely a witness to the Light! It is the servants, the brethren of Christ that are not the LIght but are witnesses to the Light. Christ is the Light of the world, the creator who with the Father and the Holy Spirit (one Lord) made the heavens, earth and seas and everything in them (Genesis 1:26, Rev. 14:7).
Matthew 23:8-10 Be not called Rabbi, for one is your master, Christ, and you are all brethren. Call no man father on earth for one is your Father, which is in Heaven. Neither be called masters, for one is your master, Christ
Matthew 10:18 You shall present my gospel before governors, kings and Gentiles, as testimony against them
John 10:14 I am the Good Shepard and I know my sheep and my sheep know me
Not all brethren among the Catholics, they got the man on top who blasphemously calls himself the 'holy father' and blasphemously claims to be the Vicar of Christ on earth. And the Catholic lay have a slew of church masters above them, in addition to said top man. Priests, bishops and cardinals are all above the Catholic lay. Even women above the Catholic men church lay, which are the nuns. Not all brethren among any Christian sect, for someone always claims position of shepard over the lay in all the churches. Pastors, ministers and reverends. In all churches, there are the pews for the lay and the elevated platform for the rulers over the lay.
And as to the Christian Coalition, the Christian oriented Tea Party and, particularly Republicans pander to the Christians in upholding bibles, churches, the God Bless America, bible belt states, those morons can have their masters in government thinking they are for God, but Christ says no one in government is for his doctrine! And indeed USA, with all of its churches, all of its church rulers and church lay is going to Hell in a handbasket, same with the Christian political parties in Europe where the governed think such political parties are of God because they use the term 'Christian' to describe themselves; and in Russian Putin relies heavily on the church for confirmation of his right to be an oligarch. A former backroom spy working for the Soviet Union spy agency KGB. Then after the dissolution of the Soviet Union working his way up through the spy agency to eventually be the head of same, and then after becoming president, his net worth is in the billions through theft. The theft of state resources that go into the pockets of a few to the deteriment of the many. The entire world is headed toward Hell in a hand basket:
Matthew 24:12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold
The Hell in a handbasket, the love of many goes cold because there shall be so much evil and violence in the world. And it gets worse when during God's judgment of the world, Satan is cast down to earth and Heaven declares:
Revelation 12:12 ... Woe to the inhabitants of earth and sea for Satan is come down unto you having great wrath because he knows he has but a short time
And the Christians
think their churches are the bride of Christ on earth, the Christian
Dominionists think they
themselves shall establish Christ's kingdom on earth (CNP, Council for National Policy, the Knights and Dames of Malta, Opus Dei who anticipate establishing the Roman Catholic church as God's kingdom on earth). They are all blind dogs, blind followers of blind Pharisee Paul. Give me my bible, I love my bible say the Christians - bibles are the greatest deception on earth for in the new testament section of all four bibles is the lying doctrine of Pharisees, and upon which lying doctrine (gospel of Pharisee Paul) all Christian churches are founded. The four bibles in order of first appearance on earth: Catholic bible, Ethiopian bible, Orthodox bible and Protestant bible. Each bible has varying writings in their old testament section and all four have identical writings in their new testament section - 27 writings, 6 are of Jews of the Lord and 21 are of Jews of Satan (the Pharisees). And the Pharisees applied some deception to the writing Matthew and writings of John. Books that are of the Lord are the Tanakh and the Torah and if one came up with a book cover that included Tanakh writings, Torah writings and the gospel of Matthew and John, including John's Revelation and his epistles, (minus the the few lies inserted therein by the Pharisees), then one would have a book that is wholly the Lord's doctrine.