DO NOT FOLLOW A PHARISEE!

REAL RISEN CHRIST



Stand John's Book of Revelation up against Pharisee Paul's gospel, for John's Book of Revelation is the only writing in bibles, other than Paul's gospel, that is said to be of the risen and ascended into Heaven Christ.  Testimony from Christ after his death, resurrection and ascension into Heaven is what the world has in John's Book of Revelation.    John speaks testimony from Christ in Heaven, after his death, resurrection and ascension into Heaven in his Book of Revelation, minus those few deceptions applied by the 325 AD Council of Nicaea to said writing.   Pharisee Paul claims to speak testimony from Christ in Heaven, after his death, resurrection and ascension into Heaven.


Therefore, when coming against Pharisee Paul for being a liar, a false apostle and the anti-Christ, in using the Book of Revelation as the basis for proof that Pharisee Paul is a liar, a false apostle and the anti-Christ, the Christians cannot use as an argument against allowing John's risen and ascended into Heaven Christ (hereinafter John's "risen Christ") to stand up against Pharisee Paul's risen christ their Christian belief, (based on Paul's gospel), that risen and ascended into  Heaven Christ gave testimony to their master Pharisee Paul that alters his eternal word spoken to the House of Israel, for we have the risen and ascended into Heaven Christ in John's Book of Revelation (unlike in other of John's writings and Matthew's writing); and John's risen and ascended into Heaven Christ does not speak testimony that alters or nullifies or contradicts the eternal word spoken to the House of Israel by Christ.     But anti-Christ Paul's false risen christ does contradict the eternal word spoken by Christ to the House of Israel.


The Christians believe that when Christ died, resurrected and ascended into Heaven, he had new testimony to bring which he could not bring prior to his death and resurrection and ascension into Heaven, and they claim that new testimony from the risen and ascended into Heaven Christ altered his testimony to the House of Israel spoken when Christ walked the earth, in the flesh (or they claim that risen and ascended into Heaven Christ has testimony for Gentiles he could not bring to them until after Christ's death and resurrection and ascension into Heaven, which is as Pharisee Paul teaches on said matter).  Pharisee Paul says Christ had to die to do away with the law, and after he arose from the grave, with the law having been done away with, Christ was then able to bring his new doctrine to the Gentiles through Pharisee Paul. That doctrine is summed up as 'grace, no more law' and 'not of works, by unmerited grace only'.     But the world has the true testimony of the risen and ascended into Heaven Christ in John's Book of Revelation, and the testimony of John's risen Christ does not contradict the eternal word Christ spoke to the House of Israel.   John's risen Christ does speak testimony that is diametrically opposed to Pharisee Paul's false risen christ testimony in Paul's gospel.


1.   Will the Christians acknowledge that in John's Book of Revelation, we have testimony of Christ from Heaven, after Christ's death, resurrection and ascension into Heaven?  


2.  Pharisee Paul claims his gospel is testimony from the risen Christ.


3.  Apostle John says his Book of Revelation is true testimony from the risen and ascended into Heaven Christ.


4.  But John's risen Christ and Pharisee Paul's risen Christ do not speak the same testimony regarding commandments of God, do not speak the same doctrine.


5.  Is John's risen Christ a false christ or is Paul's risen christ a false christ?  Christ cannot be divided within himself or he would fall, therefore either John is presenting a false risen christ to the world, or Pharisee Paul is presenting a false risen christ to the world, because John presents a risen Christ that speaks contrary to the alleged risen Christ that Pharisee Paul presents to the world in Paul's gospel.


6.   Is Christ divided within himself and therefore shall fall (Matthew 12:26), for no one can deny in truth that the testimony from John's risen Christ is a 180 degree turn from Pharisee Paul's alleged testimony from risen Christ.  But John's risen Christ is not a 180 degree turn from, not in any way contradicting, the eternal word Christ spoke to the House of Israel while Christ walked the earth, in the flesh prior to his death to atone for penalty under law.  It is Paul's false risen christ that is a deception upon the world, and the underpinning of Christendom.  It is anti-Christ Paul's false risen christ that contradicts both John's risen Christ and Christ who spoke his eternal word to the House of Israel, and told his apostles to take that same eternal word to all nations (Matthew 28:19).   But John's risen Christ and Christ who came to earth and spoke to the House of Israel do not contradict each other in testimony, as that testimony is set forth by Matthew and by John as to Christ's testimony while Christ was on earth, and Christ's testimony from Heaven, after his death, resurrection and ascension into Heaven; for they are the same being, truly testified to by his TRUE apostles.  The same Lord Christ that spoke his word to the House of Israel is the same risen Lord Christ who speaks to John from Heaven, but not the same risen false christ described by false apostle and anti-Christ Pharisee Paul in Paul's gospel.


We see a totally different risen Christ in John's Book of Revelation from the risen Christ described in Paul's gospel, and yet in both the Book of Revelation and Paul's gospel, Christendom maintains that it is Christ from Heaven, after his death, resurrection and ascension into Heaven, who is speaking.  In the case of Paul's gospel, the risen Christ allegedly speaks through Paul.  In the case of John's Book of Revelation, Christ speaks directly.  There are scant direct alleged words from Christ in Paul's gospel, and where Paul alleges Christ spoke directly to him, Christ is not teaching his doctrine, but rather instructed Paul on what he should do (Acts Ch. 9, 22:17, 22:21).


Revelation 22:14   BLESSED ARE THOSE WHO DO GOD'S COMMANDMENTS that they may have the right to eat of the fruit of the tree of life ....


Do God's commands says John's risen Christ.   But Pharisee Paul the anti-Christ claims the risen Christ says no such thing:


Romans 6:14   ...  YOU ARE NOT UNDER THE LAW ....


John's risen Christ says you are under God's law, blessed are those who do God's commandments.   Pharisee Paul's false risen christ says you are not under God's law.  Anti-Christ Paul presents a false risen christ to the world.


Everyone shall be judged according to their works, says John's risen Christ:


Revelation 20:12-13  ... and the books were opened and everyone was judged out of those things written in the books according to their works ... according to their works


But Pharisee Paul's false risen christ says no such thing:


Ephesians 2:9  NOT OF WORKS, LEST ANY MAN SHOULD BOAST


John's risen Christ says everyone is judged according to their works.   Pharisee Paul's false risen christ says no one is judged according to their works.  Pharisee Paul presents a false risen christ to the world, and upon the false risen christ Christendom is founded.


Believing upon the word of the risen Christ in John's Book of Revelation, (the true Christ), leads to life.  Believing upon the word of Pharisee Paul's false risen christ leads to death (Matthew 7:22-23).


Tell people the risen Christ says we are not under the law, tell people the risen Christ says no one is judged according to their works, and you are then an anti-Christ for becoming a convert to anti-Christ Pharisee's Paul gospel, a worker of lawlessness who claims to be of the risen Christ, but is actually of the false risen christ presented to the world by Pharisee Paul:


Matthew 7:22-23  Many shall say to me in that day, but Lord Lord, we did many wonderful works in your name ... And I shall tell them, I never knew you.  Depart from me, workers of lawlessness


Tell people the risen Christ says, blessed are those who do God's commandments, tell people the risen Christ says everyone is judged according to their works, and in all respects believe upon and speak the truth of Christ's testimony (Matthew and John's writings), and obey Christ, then you are a follower of the risen Christ.    


The testimony of the risen Christ that John brings to the world in his Book of Revelation is the true risen Christ and the true risen Christ does not contradict the eternal word he spoke to the House of Israel:


Matthew 5:17-20   Do not think I have come to destroy the law or the prophets ... teach and do God's commandments ....


Revelation 22:14  Blessed are those who do God's commandments, that they may have the right to eat of the fruit of the tree of life ....


John's risen Christ is not speaking to seven churches in the Book of Revelation, but is speaking to Jews who follow Christ who reside within seven provinces of Asia.


In the Book of Revelation, Christ says to the Jews of Asia to whom he is addressing that they must send away from them people who are teaching them to eat food sacrificed to idols (Rev. 2:14-16).   And in Paul's gospel, the document upon which Christian churches are founded, is the command that by liberty of grace, one can eat food sacrificed to idols (1 Corinthians Chs. 8 and 10).   Consider the fact that Pharisee Paul claims his gospel is testimony from the risen Christ, and that testimony is the bedrock foundation of the Christian church.  Yet we see John's risen Christ speaks against what is Pharisee Paul's false risen christ's bedrock doctrinal foundation for the Christian churches, that by grace liberty has come - no more law, therefore no more command against eating food sacrificed to idols.


But the risen Christ is not divided within himself.  The reason there are doctrinally self-opposing risen Christs (as presented in John's Book of Revelation compared with anti-Christ Pharisee Paul's gospel) is because Pharisee Paul brought a false risen christ to the world, a lying risen christ doctrine:


Romans 3:7  If the truth of God is being spread by my lie, why am I judged a sinner


There is never an "if" about it, such that in any circumstance that it would be possible for a lie to convey truth.   A lie never conveys truth.   So there is no potential that Paul's lie can spread truth of God, though Paul holds out the possibility that truth about God can be spread by Paul's lie about God.  Pharisee Paul admits his gospel is a lie.  It is no wonder that the Roman Catholic church hierarchy punished all with death who dared owned a bible without permission of the church.  But they turned out to be wrong, because even seeing Paul admit to be a liar, a practitioner of evil, the masses of Gentiles of Christendom still embrace him, where in withdrawing the bible from the masses, the Roman Catholic church hierarchy feared such statements from Paul would turn people away from Paul's gospel and therefore away from churches, which are founded solely on Paul's gospel.


Evil men of the 325 AD Council of Nicaea did alter some words in the Book of Revelation to make it appear Christ is speaking to churches in Asia, but we still have the meat of Christ's doctrine in said writing.    And where John's risen Christ forbids eating food sacrificed to idols and Pharisee Paul's risen Christ says it is okay to eat food sacrificed to idols, well then one must believe that either John writes truth, or that Paul writes truth - for both of them cannot be speaking truth for Christ is NOT divided within himself.    And if John's risen Christ is the true Christ, then no Christian church is of Christ for the Christian churches are founded on the belief that Paul's false risen christ is the true Christ, founded solely on anti-Christ Paul's gospel (Paul founded the church altar, and church rulers) and Paul's false risen christ says, go ahead and eat food sacrificed to idols, but John's risen Christ says do not eat food sacrificed to idols, and commands his people to send away from them all who are clinging to them bringing doctrine that declares it is okay to eat food sacrificed to idols.  Christ shall send away from him at judgment the many who say they did their works in the name of Christ, but Christ says they are workers of lawlessness and he sends them to the everlasting lake of fire (Matthew 7:22-23, 25:41).  Christ does not want his people eating food sacrificed to idols.  The hoards of Christendom come with Paul in hand, and it does not matter whether they strictly stick to Paul's teaching or not, they nevertheless bring Paul with them to lead others to him by claiming Paul is a true apostle of God, lead others to Paul's church altar (Hebrews 13:10).  Some Christian sects say follow God's law, and others do not, but one thing ALL OF CHRISTENDOM has in common is they all say Paul is a true apostle of God, and they are all liars for doing so.  


Where John's risen Christ says blessed are those who do God's commandments, it cannot be true that Paul's false risen christ is the real risen Christ, for Paul's false risen christ says we are not under the law.


Where John's risen Christ says everyone is judged according to their works, it cannot be true that Paul's false risen christ is the real risen Christ where Paul's false risen christ says, not of works so that no man can boast.


Where John's risen Christ says it is forbidden to eat food sacrificed to idols, it cannot be true that Paul's false risen christ is the true Christ, where Paul's false risen christ says it is okay to eat food sacrificed to idols.


The crossroad for Christians, do they believe in the testimony of John's risen Christ, or the testimony of false apostle Paul's false risen christ?   It cannot be truthfully denied that John's risen Christ and Pharisee Paul's false risen christ present diametrically opposed doctrine.


True apostle John presents the true testimony of the true risen Christ in the Book of Revelation.


False apostle and anti-Christ Pharisee Paul presents his lie in his gospel, a false risen christ that Pharisee Paul presented to the world.  A lie to the Gentiles from the Pharisees in order to conquer their Gentile prey and steal their wealth.


The Jews of Asia had Pharisee Paul removed from God's Temple and they shut the Temple doors on him.


Acts 21:27   ... when the Jews of Asia saw him, [Pharisee Paul], they cried out, men of Israel, help, this is the one that teaches all men everywhere against the people, against the law, and against  this place, and further brought Greeks into the Temple and has polluted this holy place


Acts 21:30  And all the city was moved and the people ran together and they took Paul and removed him from the Temple and shut the doors


The Jews who loved God did not like Pharisee Paul.  They called him a polluter of God's Temple, one who speaks against the Jews, against God's Temple and against Moses' law.   

Jews of Israel, Jews of Asia - they are brethren descendants of Israel, (also called Hebrews).    The term is used to this day, Jews of Europe, Jews of Israel, Jews of America.    Not all Jews were residents of Israel, and descendants of Israel residing in other territory were called Jews of whatever territory outside Israel they took up residence.


Jews who followed Christ that were alive at the time anti-Christ Pharisee Paul walked the earth and were in person with him made the same contention that is at Pharisees.org, the contention being that Pharisee Paul speaks against the Jews, against the Jerusalem Temple of God and against the law of Moses (aka God's commandments and God's law).  And indeed, that is exactly what anti-Christ Pharisee Paul does (Romans 11:28, Hebrews 8:2, 2 Cor. 3:7, Colossians 2:14, Romans 8:2, Romans 6:14).


The Jews of Asia are to whom the risen Christ speaks in Revelation Chapters 1 through 3, not Christian churches.  Evil men of the 325 AD Council of Nicaea (the ones who first brought Paul's gospel and Christ's gospel together under one book cover) altered some of said writing to make it appear that Christ is speaking to churches.      

As to anti-Christ Pharisee Paul's alleged conversion to Christ, he presents two vastly different tales of his alleged conversion to Christ:  http://beforeitsnews.com/spirit/2015/05/false-apostle-pauls-two-tales-of-conversion-2494192.html


As to anti-Christ Pharisee Paul's lie that all flesh is captive to "the law of sin" and on that basis he builds his lying grace doctrine, in Philippians 3:4-6, Pharisee Paul says he kept all of God's law in his deeds. thereby shredding to pieces his doctrine in Romans 7:16-25, which verses contain the reasoning on which anti-Christ Pharisee Paul bases his grace, no more law lie.  Not reasoning from the risen Christ, but the nonsensical rantings of a lunatic Pharisee seeking to hook Gentiles with his laughable lie of a boogie man, a body snatcher that invades the body that Pharisee Paul calls "the law of sin", which operates along the lines of Sci Fi movie invasion of the body snatchers. 
 

The Christian leaders wax on stupidly about Paul's alleged law of sin, believing same to be truth from the risen Christ through Paul, but they are blind to the fact that Paul's alleged law of sin is a lie based on Pharisee Paul's statement that he kept all of God's law in his deeds, and based on the truth John's risen Christ speaks, (as well as the testimony Christ spoke on earth)!


Philippians 3:4-6   If any man has done in his flesh whereof he thinks he may trust, I MORE SO


Understand, Christians, Pharisee Paul is stating that he has every reason to fully trust in his flesh, that his fleshly deeds were perfect before God because he followed all the righteous law of God in his flesh without blame.  And he maintains as stated while also maintaining in Romans 7:16-25 that since the original sin of Adam and Eve, all flesh is captive to the "law of sin".  He says the law of sin takes over the body to cause people to do evil.  According to anti-Christ Paul's doctrine, the law of sin operates within the flesh of Christians to cause Christians to do evil deeds, and the law of sin wars with the mind of Christians, as the Christians do not want to do evil deeds.   To the non-believer in Paul's gospel, the law of sin operates within their flesh to cause them to do evil deeds, but the non-believer in Paul's gospel is not at war in their mind with the law of sin, so says Pharisee Paul.   So where was Paul's "law of sin" to keep Paul from following any of God's law in his deeds, not to mention ALL OF GOD'S LAW IN HIS DEEDS, as Pharisee Paul says he kept all of God's law in his deeds without blame, blamelessly?  How did Pharisee Paul follow all of God's law in his deeds, while yet maintaining he has been captive to the "law of sin" since birth?  Not just him, but that all flesh since Adam and Eve's so-called original sin became infested from birth with the "law of sin", as Pharisee Paul claims.


Philippians 3:4-6 .... Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin.  A Hebrew of Hebrews.  As touching the law,  A PHARISEE, as touching the righteous that is in the law, BLAMELESS


Paul followed all of God's law in his flesh without blame, as he clearly says above.   But then he pleads captivity to "the law of sin" existing in all flesh since the fall of Adam and Eve, existing in all flesh after Adam and Eve from the time they are born, which law of sin he says causes him to be a practitioner of evil in his deeds (Romans 7:19). 

Obviously, therefore, Pharisee Paul is speaking a doctrine made up by men in Romans 7:16-25, and he trips up himself, by writing that he kept all of God's law in his deeds, thereby shredding to pieces his doctrine in Romans 7:16-25, which is the basis upon which Paul's grace lie is founded.  But I suppose the blind children of Hell converts to Pharisee Paul would give him a pass on even that.  They will still believe Paul presents the risen Christ in his gospel, despite Paul saying that he practices evil because all flesh since Adam is captive to the law of sin, while also maintaining that he kept all of God's law in his flesh, his deeds.  And despite that John's risen Christ speaks testimony opposed to the testimony presented by anti-Christ Pharisee Paul's false risen christ.


There is anti-Christ Pharisee Paul declaring that as a Pharisee, he kept all of God's law in his deeds without blame, thereby calling Christ a liar for Christ said of Pharisees:


John 8:44  YOUR FATHER IS SATAN, AND THE LUSTS OF YOUR FATHER YOU DO


And thereby the fool anti-Christ Pharisee Paul shreds to pieces his own doctrine as to why grace, no more law set forth in Romans 7:16-25.  Grace, no more law because anti-Christ Paul (and all mankind, as Paul maintains) is captive to the "law of sin" in his flesh, causing him to be unable to do good, being unable to follow God's law.   Being that Paul alleges the law of sin has infested all flesh since the fall of Adam and Eve, and that the law of sin causes people to do evil deeds, then how is it that Paul was able to keep all of God's law in his deeds, thereby shunning evil deeds?  

The tangled web of lies we weave when at first we conspire to deceive.  Pharisee Paul's gospel is a tangled web of lies.  Paul and his fellow Pharisees sought to deceive Gentiles with their lying gospel of Paul, they had the power of Satan with them, of the Beast and of the Anti-Christ Spirit to establish the empire of the Pharisees over the Gentiles which is the Roman Catholic church (her harlots (Rev. 17:5) are all non-Catholic Christian churches).  And the Beast still carries their empire (Rev. 17:7) and shall become the last pope, the eighth pope king (Rev. 17:10-11).  Bergoglio is the fifth pope king.  The world is imminently fulfilling Daniel 11:14.  The events in Daniel Ch. 11 are the last world events immediately preceding God's judgment of the world unto victory (Daniel 12:1, Matthew 12:20, Isaiah 42:3, Rev. 6:9-11).  God mentions USA and Russia in Daniel Ch. 11, they are the king of the south and the king of the north, respectively.


In Matthew 23:2-3 Christ says Pharisees say do the law of Moses, but do not do the law of Moses themselves.  The Pharisees are hypocrites.  So who is lying Christ or Pharisee Paul?  Pharisee Paul says he is not a Pharisee hypocrite, but says he kept all of God's law in his deeds as a Pharisee.  But Christ says Pharisees do the lusts of Satan and are hypocrites when it comes to following God's law in their deeds!


While Pharisee Paul proclaims in Philippians 3:4-6 that he kept all of God's law in his deeds, in Romans 7:16-25, the anti-Christ Pharisee Paul lays down his lie as to why no flesh can follow God's law in deed, claiming a law of sin has his flesh, (and all flesh), captive, causing Paul to do evil deeds with his hands, other limbs, genitals - his body is used by the law of sin to commit evil deeds. Paul says that contrary to the will of his mind, his body acts out evil deeds because his body is under control of the law of sin, and that law of sin bad boy likes to have flesh do evil deeds.  The law of sin forces all flesh to do evil deeds, whether the mind of the person residing in his own flesh body agrees with his body carrying out the evil deeds of the law of sin or not.  Anti-Christ Pharisee Paul says that whether or not the mind of the person is at war or not at war with the law of sin in their body depends on whether they believe in Paul's gospel. If a Christian, then the Christian's mind is at war with the law of sin in their flesh, as the law of sin takes over their flesh and causes them to do evil deeds contrary to the will of their mind.  If not a Christian, then the mind is not at war with the law of sin in their flesh.   Paul says his mind wars against the law of sin in his flesh, his mind not wanting to commit evil deeds, but the law of sin in his flesh forcing him to do evil deeds.  As I said, Paul paints the law of sin he created as a literal Sci Fi movie body snatcher.


So where was Paul's alleged law of sin that infests his body, taking him captive to force his body to do evil deeds, which law of sin he says entered into the flesh of Adam and Eve when they broke God's command and is in all flesh born thereafter, during the time he says his flesh kept all of God's law?


Paul is a Pharisee, a wolf in sheep clothing and his converts are twice the children of Hell than Pharisees are (Matthew 23:15, Acts 23:6, Philippians 3:5).   http://www.pharisees.org/PROPHECY_OF_THE_WOLF.html


Romans 7:20  Now if I do that which I do not want to do, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwells in me


The sin in my body caused me to do evil, contrary to the will of my mind, so says anti-Christ Paul.   Body snatcher, invasion of a snatcher of the bodies of all of mankind is what snake Pharisee Paul sold to his sucker Gentile prey in the lying doctrine of "the law of sin".

For anti-Christ Paul himself and his fellow evil Pharisees, much money was made, power held over Gentiles, by getting the sucker Gentiles to believe in snake Pharisee Paul's gospel.  It is the sucker prey Gentiles that pay over their wealth to the churches.  And Paul formed an office of apostle over Gentiles for himself to occupy (Romans 11:13), which office continues to this day and is currently held by alleged war criminal pope Bergoglio.  Where that wealth from the Gentile conquered prey is to the Roman Catholic church, the Pharisees get wealthy.  The Pharisees do not appreciate the harlots, particularly the Protestant harlots, because Protestants took away Gentile Catholic wallets and purses from the Pharisees' Roman Catholic church empire.  The first Protestants were former Catholics, disgruntled with the extravagant lifestyle of Vatican officials, and other discontents.  Pope Bergoglio makes his plea to Protestant church leaders to come back to the Catholic fold.

http://www.pharisees.org/COME_BACK_PROTESTANTS.html


Website Builder