Matthew 13:18-23 Hear the parable of the sower.  When one hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand it, then Satan comes and takes away the word that was sown in his heart ...  he that hears the word and receives it with joy but he has no root in himself and when persecution for the word comes he gives up the word ...  he that hears the word but the cares of this world ... choke the word and he is unfruitful ...  he that hears the word and understands it and bears fruit
If you believe the Son of God, then you believe what he tells you are one of four reactions that every person falls under upon hearing the word ("His Voice"). Among the kinds of reactions the Son of God states occurs, none is stated that describe a reaction where a person hears His Voice and rejects His Voice and later believes in His Voice. There are only four kinds of reactions that mankind has to hearing His Voice for the first time:
1. Hear His Voice and does not understand (One type of reaction to His Voice).
2. Hear His Voice and believe, but give up on His Voice because of persecution (One type of reaction to His Voice).
3. Hear His Voice and reject same because this world is of more important to such rejecters of His Voice (One type of reaction to His Voice).
4. Hear His Voice and accept same and understands same and bears fruit (One type of reaction to His Voice).
If you believe on the Son of God then you believe what he says and the Son of God implicitly says there is no type of reaction upon hearing His Voice where one rejects His Voice and then decides to believe His Voice. If such were the case, the Son of God would have said so. For example: He who hears the word and rejects the word but he changes his mind later and believes in the word and bears fruit. Such a reaction does not exist, where a person hears His Voice and rejects same, but later believes in same. But such a reaction is claimed for himself by false apostle and anti-Christ Paul.
Paul says that when he heard His Voice, he plotted many wants to undermine His Voice:
Acts 26:9 I did think that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth
Paul the anti-Christ heard His Voice and his reaction was to think up ways to defame the Voice, to do things contrary to the Voice. And that he did, he killed Jewish believers on the Son of God in their synagogues (Acts 9:1-2), also:
Acts 26:10 ... I put many of the saints in prison ... and when they were put to death, I testified against them
If you believe on the Son of God then you know that no one who hears His Voice kills the people of His Voice and then later comes to love His Voice, but that is exactly what anti-Christ Pharisee Paul claims of himself. And in Pharisee Paul's gospel he defames utterly, completely trashes the word of the Son of God in Matthew and John. Even going so far as to say His Voice has no role in judgment of men before God, but rather it is Paul's gospel that shall judge men (Romans 2:16).
Clearly, Pharisee Paul says he heard His Voice and then thought of ways to strike a blow against His Voice, he killed servants of His Voice. Later he says he converted to His Voice, loved His Voice, but the Son of God says it never happens that a man hear His Voice and rejects same and then changes his mind and believes in HIs Voice. Paul's conversion tales are two wholly different tales of conversion.
Acts 9:3-8 [paraphrasing] I saw a light shine around me, I heard a voice from heaven. The men with me heard a voice but saw no man. I fell to the ground and when I arose I was blind. The men took me by hand and led me to Damascus
[paraphrasing] God called me by his grace to reveal his Son in me.
Immediately I did not confer with flesh and blood. I walked to Arabia
and then I went to Damascus
Paul's two lying versions of his alleged love of His Voice. Paul heard the true His Voice and rejected same. Paul claims the voice he later heard is the same voice he first rejected. And he alleges that the voice gave him a whole new doctrine for Gentiles.
1. The world has two totally conflicting version of Paul's alleged conversion (Acts 9:3-8, Galatians 1:15-18).
2. The Son of God explicitly states the four types of reactions that mankind have to His Voice. The Son of God explained in plain and unequivocable words the meaning of the parable of the sower (Matthew 13:18-23).
3. Among the four types of reactions that people have to hearing His Voice, the Son of God excludes the possibility that a man can hear His Voice and hate same and then later change his mind and love His Voice.
4. But that is exactly what Pharisee Paul the anti-Christ claims of himself. That he heard His Voice, and then thought of all ways he could harm His Voice, and he did imprison and testify the saints of His Voice so that they would be put to death; and then allegedly hearing His Voice again, decided the second time he heard His Voice that he would love and embrace same.
The Paul converts love their master Paul and they contend they are of the Son of God. Same as their Pharisee masters claiming to love God, love Moses but they are the murderers of God's people (Matthew 23:31-35). And the Paul converts are the murderers of the followers of His Voice.
I make other valid points below as a witness against the Christians and do reiterate a simple to understand fact:
1. The Son of God says never does a man hear His Voice and rejects His Voice and then later embraces His Voice.
2. The anti-Son of God and a false apostle, Benjamite wolf Jew Pharisee Paul, states he hated His Voice when he heard it, killed the servants of His Voice and then later embraced and loved His Voice. He is a liar (Matthew 13:18-23), also:
Romans 3:7 If the truth of God is being spread by my lie, why am I judged a sinner
So evil the Christians, they believe truth can come from lies or are they blind to see that their master Pharisee Paul makes exactly that very claim, his lie spreads truth of God. All who believe in Paul believe that truth can come from lies, because Paul says his lie is spreading truth of God and the believers in Pau's word stand behind Paul's word (Isaiah 66:17, Matthew 7:22-23).
What category of reaction to His Voice does Paul fall under? It is number 3 above. Those who hear His Voice but this world is more important to them. The Pharisees saw the miracles of the Son of God but this world was more important to them. Pharisee Paul was among the Pharisees who said the following:
12:47-50 The chief priests and Pharisees gathered together and said,
what shall we do, for this man does many miracles. If we let him alone,
all men will believe on him ... from that day forward they took counsel
together to put [the Son of God] to death
The reaction of Pharisee Paul to His Voice was to keep more Jews from believing on the Son of God. Pharisee Paul got authority from the chief priests to enter Damascus synagogues and remove all men and women who believed on His Voice (Acts 9:1-2). Pharisees only care about their lives in this world:
Matthew 23:25 [Pharisees] are full of excess and extortion
It later came to mind of anti-Son of God Pharisee Paul to invent his own religion for the Gentiles (1 John 2:18, Matthew 24:24, which should read as 1 John 2:18 reads, but for the 325 AD Council of Nicaea altering parts of Matthew and John's writings). Pharisee Paul came up with his lie that he received a doctrine from the Son of God from Heaven. Can you imagine, the Son of God was just a few years off the earth after having laid down his doctrine for mankind, and along comes a Pharisee claiming he received new doctrine from the Son of God that makes trash of His Voice spoken on earth! Yet such a thing happened, the rise of anti-Christ Paul to smash the doctrine of the Son of God. Yet, in John's Book of Revelation His Voice is spoken from the position of being the risen and ascended into Heaven Son of God and there His Voice is the same His Voice that he spoke on earth, while he walked the earth in the flesh:
Matthew 5:19 ... teach and do God's commandments
Revelation 22:14 Blessed are those who do God's commandments ...
But anti-Christ Paul says that God's commandmets were replaced as follows:
Romans 8:2 The law of the spirit of life in Jesus Christ freed me from the law of sin and death
It took a few hundreds years before the Pharisees got tired of doctrinal arguments with the followers of the Son of God. In 325 AD, the Pharisees' Council of Nicaea, they came up with a way to quash the doctrinal arguments, by placing both doctrines (His Voice and anti-Son of God Paul's gospel) under one book cover, bible. Roman Emperor Constantine was presiding and he made it a civil crime to speak against the bible. The declaration was made, the Pharisees' bible is all the word of God. The children of Hell Paul converts take great comfort in their bible, where His Voice stands next to the gates of Hell in the Christian bibles. The gates of Hell is every writing in the new testament section of all four bibles, except the one writing of Matthew and five writings of John. Four bibles in the world - Catholic, Ethiopian, Orthodox and Protestant. Same list of writings in their new testament section, varying list of writings in their old testament section. The Ethiopian bible has the most number of writings at 81, the Protestant bible has the least number of writings, 66.
The Christian Paul converts will never acknowledge truth. They will never side with the Son of God. They are children of Hell and so are Pharisees. Why do the children of Hell Pharisees want to sit in Moses's seat? Why do men of Satan want to sit in Moses' seat?
23:2-3 The Pharisees and scribes sit in Moses' seat. Therefore,
whatever they bid you do that you should do and observe. But do not do
after their works, for they say do but do not themselves
John 8:44 You [Pharisees] are of Satan ....
The children of Hell Paul converts will say "do" as to doctrine of the Son of God in Matthew and John's writings, but they do not do themselves. They do the doctrine of anti-Son of God Pharisee Paul. Just like the Jew Pharisees, they say do Moses' law, but do not do themselves. They do their own doctrines - Mishnah and Talmud,.which are contrary to Moses' law (aka God's commandments).
The Son of God has His Voice in the world, it is his word written in Matthew and John. Said writings suffered a few deceptions applied therein by the 325 AD Council of Nicaea.
His Voice is not made know throughout the world until the just before the end comes:
Matthew 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world as a witness to all nations and then the end shall come
The gospel of the kingdom is in Matthew and John's writings. The gospel of the kingdom is no where in the writings of the gospel of Pharisee Paul, and Pharisee writings Mark, Luke, James, Jude and Pharisee forgeries 1 and 2 Peter. See this link for more information: http://beforeitsnews.com/spirit/2015/11/bible-bombshell-christians-wont-believe-2497798.html
The Son of God and the prophets speak of the coming kingdom of God on earth. The Christians believe in anti-Christi Paul and Pharisee forgeries 1 and 2 Peter which declare no kingdom of God to come on earth; rather, as stated in the widely known Left Behind series co-authored by Tim LaHaye, the good people leave the earth and the evil people are left behind to burn up with the earth. The believers in Paul's gospel are blind children of Hell, for the Son of God states otherwise:
Matthew 13:41 The Son of God shall send forth his angels who shall remove all evil people and all offensive things from the earth
Matthew 5:5 The meek shall inherit the earth
The Left Behind series is the work of children of Hell Paul converts (Matthew 7:22-23) and believed in by the children of Hell Christians, apparently oblivious to the fact that the Son of God's testimony speaks against the Left Behind series, against the gospel of Paul.
The gospel of Christianity, which is the gospel of Paul, has already been preached in all the world. Paul is the rock (actually, sand) upon which all Christian churches are founded, as the church establishment is wholly within Paul's gospel. Christians claim their churches are built on Peter the rock, but in actuality it is solely within Paul's gospel that churches are founded:
1. The church altar is founded by Pharisee Paul in Hebrews 13:10
2. The church Eucharist ritual is founded by Pharisee Paul in 1 Corinthians 11:26
3. The command to pay money to churches is made by Pharisee Paul in Romans 15:27
4. The command to church lay to obey church rulers is made by Pharisee Paul in Hebrews 13:17
5. The command to churchgoers to obey nation rulers is made by Pharisee Paul in Romans Ch. 13 and in Titus 3:1-3
6. Pharisee Paul takes sole credit for establishing the Christian churches. He was given the alleged doctrine of the Son of God that established Christian churches for Gentiles (Acts Ch. 9, Galatians 1:15-18, 2:7-8)
7. Pharisee Paul specifically states that Peter never preached Paul's gospel (Galatians 2:7-8). Therefore, there exists no doctrine of Peter that established the Christian churches. Paul, the real master of Christians (not the Son of God) says Peter and Christ are of the same doctrine, but not he:
Galatians 2:7 Peter is the preacher of Circumcision for the Jews
Romans 15:8 Christ is the preacher of Circumcision
Galatians 2:8 Paul is the preacher of Un-Circumcision
And it is solely on that Un-Circumcision doctrine written by and preached by anti-Christ Paul that the Christian churches are founded on, and no other doctrine:
Galatians 2:7-8 Peter is the preacher of Circumcision for the Jews and I [Paul] am the preacher of Un-Circumcision for the Gentiles
One of the big lies of Christianity is that Peter founded churches. The Christians quote the Pharisee-doctored verse (325 AD Council of Nicaea) in Matthew that allegedly the Son of God told Peter that upon Peter the Lord shall establish his church. Where is the written doctrine of Peter that establishes Christian churches? None exists. The written doctrine upon which Christian churches are founded is Paul's gospel alone, with Pharisee forgeries 1 and 2 Peter thrown in for good measure by the Pharisees. That was a clever move on their part because that is the last resort means of the Christians to defend their anti-Son of God master, Pharisee Paul. But such defense really does not exist when one examines Pharisee forgeries 1 and 2 Peter. To believe said writings are Peter's one would have to believe Peter went to the dark side, disavowed His Voice. Peter never disavowed the word of the Son of God!
Paul is the anti-Christ and a false apostle (1 John 2:18, which is how Matthew 24:24 should read, and Rev. 2:2, 2 Timothy 1:15).